The battle over
Michigan's film subsidy program has reached new urgency in the wake of Gov.
Rick Snyder’s first budget proposal. His spending plan, released last week, calls for
drastically reducing monetary favors to the film industry.
Since then, the
headlines have screamed.
“Hollywood wary of Michigan; Fallout begins over proposed cut to tax
incentives,” warned Variety on Feb.
industry to fade away along with tax incentives,” echoed MLive
on Feb. 18.
Detroit Free Press columnist Mitch Albom has been one
of the most strident supporters of the film incentives, which include a
refundable tax subsidy of up to 42 percent for film or television production in the
state. In his Feb. 20 column,
Albom called himself a “person who helped create the film credits program.”
He is now rallying the troops to preserve his creation.
Michigan Budget Director John
Nixon is not surprised by the stepped-up efforts of Albom and others.
“The outcry you can anticipate,” said Nixon. “People
in the film industry know how to rally troops. They’re professionals in PR.
That’s what they are.”
In an interview
with Michigan Capitol Confidential, Nixon said he also
understands why many people are excited about the movie industry in Michigan.
But he cautions that people need to understand what is at stake.
“You just don’t get enough money back in the state
coffers,” he said of the film subsidy program.
Right now, the state of Michigan writes a check to filmmakers
for up to 42 percent of their spending in Michigan, minus the taxes they owe. Nixon
says those taxes are minimal compared to the refund. For instance, if movie
producers spend $100 million in Michigan, the state could end up giving these producers up to $42 million, and the $42 million has to come from
Nixon said this is where the challenge lies: “All of a sudden, we have to cut that money out of the budget because it’s not going to be
bottom line is, there’s no other place in state government where we just say,
‘we’re going to pay 42 percent, and let us know what the bill is,’” Nixon added. “We
don’t do that with Medicaid. We don’t do that with any other program. We don’t
just say, ‘send us the bill’ and we’ll pay 42 percent of it.”
there’s no limit to what that bill could be under the existing program. If
movie spending in Michigan reached $500 million, the state could be on the hook
for more than $200 million. The program is
structured so that it is possible for filmmakers to get back checks that exceed
the cost of the taxes that they paid in the first place.
that’s $200 million that’s not going to Medicaid or to roads or other services
provided by the state,” said Nixon.
Nixon stressed that the
governor’s proposal to change the way the state does the movie business is not
an attack on the film industry.
“The entertainment industry is a viable industry,” he said.
And he says it may
be a good investment, but the mechanism by which the incentives are handled
needs to make sense to the taxpayers and the state.
“I wouldn’t sit here and say we have
to kill it or it’s a waste of time. We have to come up with a mechanism that
doesn’t hurt the state the more successful they (the filmmakers) are. Whatever
the number is, it’s coming at the expense of something else.”
Hall” meeting was scheduled to be held Feb. 24 to address the governor’s
plans. Mitch Albom was one of several featured speakers on the schedule. The
agenda was set to include the following:
"(V)arious evidence and
informational points, legislators’ names and contact info, and strategic
methods on conveying the most effective message possible to legislative officials
and districts statewide to preserve Michigan's fledgling film industry."
Nixon defended the
governor’s plan, which leaves intact $75 million already approved for film
subsidies, and allows for another $25 million.
“Given the current
climate, what we have proposed is very reasonable,” he said. “Given the current
climate taking $100 million out of the budget when we have a billion and a half (deficit) out of budget shows we’re supportive of what’s going on. If they want
to talk about a formula that makes sense, that brings money to the coffers,
let’s sit down and talk about it.”
believes that whatever magic number ends up in the budget for film incentives,
Hollywood will use it all.
As for the fervor of
film industry supporters, he suggests they step back and realize just what
they’re asking of taxpayers.
“(Film supporters) say
we have to go, go, go! Where are we going to cut, cut, cut?”
Film Transparency – Just say No?
State Subsidies for
Hollywood Dying in Iowa and Drawing Fire In Missouri and Michigan
Huizenga discusses Michigan’s film subsidies
Film Subsidy Secrecy
May Be Ending
Michael & Me
Lawmaker Says Special
Tax Favors Are 'Cronyism'
Analysis: Michael Moore
Appears Ready to Take Film Subsidy for Anti-Subsidy Film
Cost to Replace Lost
Jobs with Michigan Film Subsidies: $39.4 Billion
Sorry — Your Film
Office Success Story Was Not Found
Bills Would Demand More
Info From Filmmakers Getting Special Tax Breaks
Incentives Raise Questions
Michael Moore and
Subsidies: A Love-Hate Story
Lawmakers Tackle Film
Inadvertently Makes Case Against Film Subsidies (Again)
Analysis of Michigan
Film Subsidies: Two Years, $117m - and No Film Job Growth
Michael Moore's 'Greed'
Message Doesn't Apply to His Film's Financiers
Investigation Leads to Criminal Charge
Attorney General Heeds
Requests for Investigation of Embattled Film Studio
Senator Says MEDC
Should Stop Believing Its Own Press Releases