Mackinac Center Legal Foundation

Cases | Amicus Briefs | Our Issues | Publications | Accomplishments | Donate |

Have a case for us?
Home / Cases
Michael Dorr
Free speech Property rights

Michael Dorr

Michael Dorr owns a beautiful cottage in Saint Clair Shores. Like many young entrepreneurs, Dorr recognized a need in his community and decided to fill it. This need was for safe home rentals at a reasonable price.

CASE UPDATE: On June 2, 2021, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal. Because of this, the Court of Appeals' decision stands.

Case summary | Documents & Timeline

Case summary

What started as a way to earn extra income quickly turned into an opportunity to help businesses in his community thrive. "My house guests would shop at local businesses and the owners really liked that,” Dorr said. Unfortunately, not everyone thought his business made a positive contribution to the area. In spring 2017, Dorr was issued a citation and fined $150 by a district court for renting out his home through Airbnb.

While no law explicitly forbids home sharing in St. Clair Shores, attorney Robert Ihrie claimed that Dorr's businesses violated the city's zoning ordinances. Derk Wilcox, senior attorney for the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, argues that the zoning laws in the city do not prohibit home sharing and that the law is silent on the matter. "The city attorney seems to be taking the position that anything that the zoning laws do not specifically allow, is prohibited. But using this logic, if you paint your house beige, and the city code doesn't say specifically that it can be that color, then they can fine you $500 or put you in jail for up to 90 days. That is the opposite of how the law is supposed to work. You cannot be punished by the law unless what you are doing is clearly prohibited" said Wilcox.

On Sept. 12, the city of St. Clair Shores filed a complaint against Dorr, and the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation has decided to represent him in the hopes that the case will establish a precedent that will help protect all homeowners from invasive government overreach.

In October 2020, the Court of Appeals ruled against Dorr, stating that "St. Clair Shores Zoning Ordinance 15.556(1) requires that the home business be “incidental” to the use of the dwelling as a dwelling. We concur with the trial court that a person of ordinary intelligence would reasonably understand from this language that the business therefore cannot be coextensive with the primary use of the dwelling as a dwelling and that the ordinance therefore prohibits the type of short-term rental business that defendant was running from his home under these circumstances."

On June 2, 2021, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal. Because of this, the Court of Appeals' decision stands.

Share page: Facebook Twitter Email

Donate

Documents & Timeline

December 2019

  • Brief Cover Page December 20, 2019

October 2020

  • MCOA Oral Arguments October 6, 2020 – Panel 1 October 6, 2020

  • Swartzle Dissent October 29, 2020

  • Jansen Concurrence October 29, 2020

  • Majority Opinion October 29, 2020

June 2021

  • Final Order of the Supreme Court June 2, 2021

Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Donate | About | Blog | Pressroom | Publications | Careers | Site Map | Email Signup | Contact

Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Overton Window Podcast

(989) 631-0900 | 140 W. Main Street Midland, MI 48640 P.O. Box 568 | mcpp@mackinac.org | © 2023 Mackinac Center for Public Policy