Though its students score abysmally on state reading and math tests, and though classroom management appears to be severely lacking, the Highland Park City school district still may be the best available alternative for some Detroit-area students.
State data showing what districts students are choosing toleave and where they are going reveals that many students from Detroit are choosing Highland Park.
This is not evidence that the Highland Park district is successful; in fact, a recent suit by the American Civil Liberties Union suggests that it has severe shortcomings. Unfortunately, the students from Detroit choosing Highland Park have limited choices.
If a school district elects to participate in the “schools of choice” program, students from other districts can choose to attend one of its schools (and the enrolling district receives funding on their behalf).
Highland Park offers nonresident students that option, and during the 2011-12 school year, nearly 340 of them (representing more than a third of the district's total enrollment) chose to enroll in the Highland Park district. All but eight of those students came from Detroit Public Schools.
The map below shows the school districts surrounding DPS. Districts that have enrolled students who reside in DPS are shown in varying shades of green (the darkest shade indicates that more than 800 DPS students chose to enroll in that district and the lightest shade indicates that one to 15 DPS students chose to enroll in that district). The Detroit school district is shown in red and the Highland Park district is outlined in black.
Districts either not offering choice or offering choice but not receiving DPS students are shown in white.
Highland Park took a large share of DPS students, but so did the districts of Oak Park (1,550 full-time DPS students) Clintondale, (1,121), Inkster (797), Ferndale (479), Westwood (471), Dearborn (431), Hamtramck (356), and Melvindale-North Allen (351).
Districts sharing a border with the Detroit district, but not enrolling DPS students during the 2012-13 school year include Southfield, Hazel Park, Van Dyke, Grosse Pointe, and Dearborn.
It is true that some students in Highland Park chose to leave (some even for DPS), but on balance, nearly 50 percent more nonresident students chose to enroll in the district than resident students chose to leave it.
For many parents, it appears that Highland Park is generally preferable to DPS. Though student choice counts indicate parental preference, they can't tell us why students are choosing Highland Park. Some may think it is a better choice academically, while others may value other characteristics, such as perceived safety.
More than 7,600 full-time students left DPS for other schools in conventional school districts during the 2011-12 school year. An astounding number — 46,800— of full-time students left for area public charter schools. Students leaving for Highland Park may be an indication that there still is not enough choice available for Detroit students.
It is disappointing that school quality in the Detroit area has deteriorated to the point where a district with just 35 percent of fourth grade students and 25 percent of seventh grade students scoring "proficient" on state reading tests looks like the most attractive available option. But this is the sad reality when many DPS schools report even lower reading proficiency rates.
Further school choice is needed for Detroit students, be it more district participation in schools-of-choice, expansion of virtual and charter schools, or education finance reform that allows state aid to more easily follow a student to the school of his or her choice.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.
Permission to reprint any comments below is granted only for those comments written by Mackinac Center policy staff.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.