Some critics ignore or overlook the fact that Michigan's public charter schools exist to offer families a better option. These critics may not realize these options endure because most of those families prefer what they have found.
A recent Detroit Free Press article depicted the choice movement as represented by a few Detroit parents who decided to leave charter schools to re-enroll their child in the state's largest school district. Not surprisingly, such portrayals cry out for context.
Earlier this year the Mackinac Center sponsored an online survey of more than 1,400 Michigan charter school parents. The questionnaire followed a 2017 phone poll of 800 parents who exercised some form of educational choice, whether in a charter school or in a district other than the one where they live.
According to both surveys, most parents who have selected a different public school than the one assigned to their home address highly rate their child's new school, expect more of their child's educational success and recommend the experience to others. Going into greater depth, the newer report also more clearly highlights the diverse and pressing reasons that drive families to choose a public charter school.
In a state where poor student performance on state tests is clearly documented, it is not surprising that parents are most likely to say weak academics motivated their search for a new school. Yet many Michigan charter parents also placed high priority on other concerns, whether greater flexibility to meet special learning needs or an environment safe from bullying, racism or other campus dangers.
About 70 percent of the parents surveyed said they faced no significant challenges in finding a charter school. Among those who did, the most commonly cited obstacles were finding information on school quality and finding schools with openings. This was especially true for parents who said they weren't able to enroll their child in the charter school that was their first choice.
And where do parents typically turn to find the information they need? Families who end up opting for an online charter rate the cyber school's website as most important, while campus visits take precedence for those at brick-and-mortar campuses.
In Michigan, charter schools represent a major vehicle for greater educational opportunity. But that doesn’t mean they will work out for everyone. While most parents who select a charter school for their child have favorable experiences, about 10 percent expressed enough dissatisfaction to consider switching to a different school this fall.
Most of the families who thought of switching have very few or no alternatives to enrolling in a local district or finding another charter school. Some families sacrifice to pay tuition, if they can afford it. Restrictive language in Michigan's constitution says public funds or credits cannot be used to aid students that attend a private school.
Michigan residents, however, say they want a type of private school choice program that is available in nearly 20 states. In a July survey sponsored by the Mackinac Center, half or more of the state's likely voters strongly favor providing tax credits for scholarship donations that help underwrite private school tuition for low-income or special needs students. Total support exceeds 70 percent.
Nearly 60 percent back a similar plan: state-funded education savings accounts that allow parents to, in the words of the survey, "pay tuition for private schools or online education programs, private tutoring or to save for future college expenses."
Voter support stands even stronger for protecting the educational choices Michigan families already enjoy. Two-thirds favor the concept behind the state's Schools of Choice program, which allows students to enroll in neighboring districts. And for the third consecutive edition of this biennial poll, 55 percent of the state's voters rightly reject the argument that school choice hurts traditional public schools.
Most respondents say Michigan has the right amount of choice, but those who say the state needs more choice are twice the number of those who say it has too much (26 to 12 percent). Notably, 58 percent of Detroiters agree that there is not enough choice in education. That comes from a city where tens of thousands of students already have fled the assigned district, causing some major media outlets to lament the "chaos" of too many options.
If reporters and pundits actually listened to families who have exercised their right to choose, we might begin to have more conversations about how to expand access to effective learning options and less talk of taking those options away.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.
Permission to reprint any comments below is granted only for those comments written by Mackinac Center policy staff.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.