The Manhattan Institute last year commissioned polls in a number of states on public attitudes regarding government workers. One of the questions dealt directly with an issue the Michigan Legislature will face during a one-day session scheduled for Aug. 15: closing the school pension system to new employees, and instead giving them generous 401(k) contributions.
Here’s what 400 Michigan voters were asked about the issue in a poll conducted by Douglas E. Schoen, LLC between Aug. 29 and Sept. 5, 2011, and what they thought:
Do you favor or oppose moving all new public employees from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan?
TOTAL FAVOR: 51 percent
TOTAL OPPOSE: 36 percent
Strongly favor: 30 percent
Somewhat favor: 20 percent
Strongly oppose: 19 percent
Somewhat oppose: 17 percent
Not sure: 13 percent
The Michigan Senate has already voted for a bill to do what the majority in this poll supported — to close the “defined-benefit” school pension system to new employees (Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"). The Michigan House has voted instead to keep enrolling new school employees into a somewhat less generous defined-benefit pension system (Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No")
Michigan taxpayers are currently on the hook for $27.8 billion in unfunded school and state government employee pension liabilities, an amount that increased $6.1 billion in just the last year and $12.7 billion in two years. Under the Senate-passed pension reform bill, no new long-term taxpayer liabilities would be created when new school employees are hired. Under the House-passed version, every new hire creates new long-term taxpayer liabilities. Based on the state’s record of chronic pension underfunding, the likelihood is high that these, too, will eventually become unfunded liabilities.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.