In 2003, as Michigan was accelerating into what would later be dubbed an economic “lost decade” and tax collections were in decline, legislators were desperate to avoid hard decisions on necessary spending cuts. It was a time of accounting gimmicks and fund shifts, but as one pundit put it, “They’ve turned over all the couch cushions and there’s no more change left to find.”
One of the most unfortunate consequences of the revenue scramble was a new law that imposed “driver responsibility fees” of up to $2,000 for individuals responsible for certain serious or multiple traffic violations. Supporters gave lip service to the notion that this was about traffic safety, but everyone knew it was really a revenue grab.
At the time many predicted the “bad driver tax” burdens would fall most heavily on those at the lower end of the income spectrum, and that the state would never collect the $65 million in annual revenue the measure was projected to extract. Both predictions came true as a House committee heard last fall in testimony on a bill to terminate the fees and cancel the debt of individuals who fell behind paying them. Some examples:
A district court judge described a homeless father of five who came before him and who owed $7,000 in delinquent fees and fines.
The judge also reported that 45 percent of those before his court for driving without a license lost their license because they could not afford to pay driver responsibility fees.
A city of Detroit official reported that some 76,000 city residents owed more than $124 million with an average liability of $1,629. He said most of it will never be collected.
As of August 2017 the total liability for unpaid bad driver taxes was $637 million, of which probably half was uncollectable due to individuals inability to pay.
Michigan’s current secretary of state was a member of the House when the law authorizing the fees was passed. She told the committee, “I thought they were unfair then and I think they are unfair now. Get rid of them.”
“Get rid of them” is just what happened this week as the House and Senate both approved and sent to Gov. Rick Snyder for approval a package of bills that repeals the fees and forgives all liability for unpaid amount.
This agreement also resolves tensions that erupted at the same committee hearing last fall when a state treasury official said the administration opposed the original versions of the repeal bills, in part because they didn’t want to lose the revenue.
This came after a number of speakers had described the social damage and wrecked lives left behind by the law, which caused the committee chairman and others to bristle at the seemingly misplaced priorities. The official quickly backed up and expressed the administration’s willingness to work on a solution. With the governor’s expected signature the repeal and debt forgiveness will go into effect next Sept. 30.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.
Permission to reprint any comments below is granted only for those comments written by Mackinac Center policy staff.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.