Senate Bill 716: Require legislative authorization for transportation commission borrowing: Passed 22 to 16 in the Senate
To prohibit a state transportation commission from borrowing more than $100 million in any fiscal year without first giving the legislature at least 30 days' notice. The bill would empower the legislature to halt the borrowing with a majority vote in the House and Senate. If this bill were passed and signed by the Governor (unlikely), it would likely lead to suspension of $3.5 billion in road repair debt that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer ordered the commission to approve, which it did on Jan. 30, 2020.
Related, the Senate also passed with a voice-vote a non-binding resolution declaring that it would not vote to appropriate money to pay the increased debt service on this debt. Related, the Senate also passed on a voice-vote a non-binding resolution declaring that it would not vote to appropriate money to pay the increased debt service on that new road borrowing. The resolution has no effect, but a later vote to deny appropriations to repay already-borrowed money could trigger a state government showdown and fiscal crisis.
House Bill 5053: Authorize "clawbacks" to enforce state vendor contracts: Passed 106 to 0 in the House
To authorize “clawbacks” (repayments) from state vendors who breach their contract with the state, and require agencies to use this method to enforce contracts.
House Bill 5333: Revise allowable use of money in state forest development fund: Passed 106 to 0 in the House
To revise the allowable uses of money collected in a state forest development fund. The bill would explicitly prohibit this money from being used to cover administrative expenses at the state Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, or to make "payments in lieu of taxes" to local governments with large amounts of (tax exempt) state property in their jurisdiction. It would allow this money to be used for forest management expenses including those related to state timber sales.
To prohibit local governments from using any public resources for firearm purchase (“buyback”) programs. Governments could only buy guns from licensed dealers for law enforcement purposes.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.
Permission to reprint any comments below is granted only for those comments written by Mackinac Center policy staff.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.