In mid-September, President Joe Biden admitted the COVID-19 pandemic was over. But a few weeks later, Elizabeth Hertel, Michigan’s health director, indicated just the opposite. She didn’t directly contradict the president, but Hertel did unilaterally issue new “epidemic orders” in October related to COVID-19.
You probably haven’t heard of these new state mandates. That’s because they only apply to residential care facilities, such as nursing homes, assisted living centers and adult foster care facilities. One requires regular COVID-19 testing of residents in these facilities. The other mandates social distancing and protocols for reporting positive COVID-19 tests at the facilities, among other things. Both are continuations of policies created more than two years ago.
One problem with these orders is that they are inconsistent with the latest official information from the federal government. In August, the CDC updated its guidance on COVID-19 so that the same rules apply for those who are up to date on their vaccines and those who are not. Since the vaccines do not prevent transmission of the virus that causes COVID-19, there’s no justification for treating these groups differently.
But Hertel’s latest epidemic orders still discriminate based on vaccination status. Some rules for these residential care facilities, such as physical distancing and mask wearing, only apply when non-fully vaccinated people are present. But the orders also rely on an outdated definition of “fully vaccinated.” They classify people who have had the original vaccines as fully vaccinated, but the CDC says people must have had at least one booster to meet that definition.
The more serious problem with these orders is the department’s misuse of emergency powers. These are, by definition, temporary powers, but the Whitmer administration continues to stretch them to new extremes. If these orders are truly necessary, the health department should follow the regular rulemaking process to implement them officially. State officials are not entitled to make unilateral decisions for however long they like. This is one reason why Michigan needs to significantly reform its emergency power laws.
Permission to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.