British Prime Minister William Gladstone recognized that love and power are often at odds with each other.
Source: Library of Congress, LC-D43-T01-50272 DLC
"We look forward to the time when the power of love will replace the love of power. Then will our world know the blessings of peace."
So declared British Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone more
than a century ago. His audience responded then the same way audiences would
today — with nodding approval. But today’s world seethes with hypocrisy. Though
we say we prefer love over power, the way we behave in the political corner of
our lives testifies all too often to the contrary.
I resolve to learn more about the principles of love and liberty so that I can convincingly defend them against the encroachments of power.
Gladstone knew that love and power are two very different
things, often at odds with each other. Love is about affection and respect;
power is about control.
When real love is the motivator, people deal with each other
peacefully. We use force only in self-defense. We respect each other’s rights
and differences. Tolerance and cooperation govern our interactions.
Suppose we want to influence or change the behavior of another
adult, or want to give him something we think he should have. This person has
done us no harm and is in full command of his faculties. Love requires that we
reason with him, entice him with an attractive offer or otherwise engage him on
a totally voluntary basis. He is free to accept or reject our overtures. If we
don’t get our way, we don’t hire somebody to use force against him. We "live and
A mature, responsible adult neither seeks undue power over other
adults nor wishes to see others subjected to anyone’s controlling schemes and
fantasies. This is the rationale for limiting the force of government in our
lives. In a free society, the power of love governs our behavior instead of the
love of power.
But politics today provides a sad commentary on the ascendancy
of the love of power over the power of love. We have granted command of 40
percent of our incomes to federal, state and local governments, compared to 6 or
7 percent a century ago. And more than a few Americans seem to think that 40
percent still isn’t enough.
We don’t trust the choices parents might make in a free
educational marketplace, so we force those who prefer private options to pay
twice — once in tuition for the alternatives they choose, and then again in
taxes for a system they seek to escape.
Millions of Americans think government should impose an endless
array of programs and expenses on their fellow citizens, from nationalized
health plans to child day care to subsidized art and recreation. We’ve burdened
our children and grandchildren, whom we claim to love, with trillions in
national debt — all so that the leaders we elected and re-elected could spend
more than we were willing to pay for. We claim to love our fellow citizens while
we hand government ever more power over their lives, hopes and pocketbooks.
If you think these trends can go on indefinitely, or if you
think power is the answer to our problems, or if you think loving others means
diminishing their liberties, you’re part of the problem. If you want to be part
of the solution, then consider adopting the following resolutions:
I resolve to keep my hands in my own pockets, to leave others alone unless they threaten me harm, to take responsibility for my own actions and decisions, and to impose no burdens on others that stem from my own poor judgments.
I resolve to strengthen my own character so I can be the model of integrity that friends, family and acquaintances will want to respect and emulate.
If I have a "good idea," I resolve to elicit support for it through peaceful persuasion, not force. I will not ask politicians to foist it on others just because I might think it’s good for them.
I resolve to offer help to others who genuinely need it by involving myself directly or by supporting those who are providing assistance through charitable institutions. I will not complain about a problem and then insist that government fix it at twice the cost and half the effectiveness.
I resolve to learn more about the principles of love and liberty so that I can convincingly defend them against the encroachments of power. And I resolve to do whatever I can to replace the love of power with the power of love.
A tall order, to be sure. Let’s get started.
Lawrence W. Reed is president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a research and educational institute headquartered in Midland, Mich. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author and the Center are properly cited.