The following letter to the editor appeared in the Jan. 21, 2002 Wall Street Journal.

Your Jan. 9 editorial "Beck and Beyond" contained many important points but failed to assess the likelihood that the Beck case could realistically be enforced according to the Supreme Court's directions, due to the status of pending NLRB nominations.

Currently three Clinton holdover members of the board have signed onto cases eroding Beck rights (which establishes that unions can't spend dues money on political causes their dues-paying members don't support).  Republican Chairman Hurtgen is operating with a recess appointment and he will continue to align himself with two Democratic appointees who oppose the full extension of Beck principles to workers.  Two new conservative Bush appointments would not alter this scenario.  In essence, it would be necessary for one of the holdovers to change positions, which is extremely doubtful, or Mr. Bush would have to withdraw his Hurtgen nomination and replace him with a pro-Beck candidate.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Unless the Bush administration reassesses the board appointments with respect to Beck rights, worker political freedom will remain in the deep freeze for the forseeable future.

Robert P. Hunter
Director of Labor Policy
Mackinac Center for Public Policy

For more on Beck rights, please see the Mackinac Center study, "Compulsory Union Dues in Michigan" by Mr. Hunter.

~~~~~

Related Articles:

Here are the Issues Facing Detroit Schools

Dental Therapists Would Improve Access to Care

Feds Force Michigan Cherries to Rot – In Order To Raise Prices

Dental Therapists: A Proposal to Expand Access to Dental Care in Michigan

This Week in Fiscal Policy News

Legacy Society