In MLive today, Sen. Bert Johnson, D-Detroit, attempts to make the case that voters should repeal the state’s emergency manager law, which is Proposal 1 on the ballot. He argues that the law is undemocratic. However, he fails to note that referendum leaves local control unaddressed.

Michigan voters are being asked whether to affirm or nullify Public Act 4 of 2011, the state’s emergency manager law. Repealing this law would reinstate the old emergency financial manager law. These laws both allow state takeovers of fiscally distressed local governments and school districts.

But even if the state lacked a law that instilled a state-appointed receiver, it is still possible for an appointed receiver to control a government. The city of Ecorse was taken over in the 1980s by a local court after it couldn't pay vendors.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

If voters are concerned about their local government’s elected officials losing their power to a state- or court-appointed receiver, then they need to ensure that their local governments can pay their bills. The state’s emergency manager law is one last step in ensuring that local governments in Michigan meet their financial obligations. This power will remain regardless of whether Public Act 4 is repealed.


Related Articles:

Transit: So Popular it Needs to be Subsidized

The Cost of the Proposal 1: The May Tax Vote

Proposal 1 Will Cost Average Michigan Household Up to $525 a Year in Extra Taxes

Proposal 1 Would Pay Michigan's Road Debt Hangover

Making Sense Of The Complicated Ballot Language For Proposal 1

New Study Analyzes Impact of Proposal 1 on Taxpayers