A Republican state representative recently asked how a private, non-profit organization funds its operations and questioned the group's credentials because it chooses not to make public the names of those who contribute to it.

The group, Sunshine Review, which maintains a website that rates the transparency of state and local governments, was invited to testify at a committee hearing in which Rep. Bradford Jacobsen, R-Oxford, is a member.

During the hearing Rep. Jacobsen challenged the editor of the group's website, saying Sunshine Review should share the names of its contributors. However, doing so would infringe on the rights of private individuals and harm the mission of government scrutiny.

Government transparency laws are an important component of democracy and freedom. Among the most critical are open records laws like Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act. For watchdogs like Sunshine Review and Michigan Capitol Confidential, this law is vital to performing our mission. In just the last year, CapCon has used FOIA requests to break the following stories and more:

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Like Sunshine Review, Michigan Capitol Confidential is a non-profit organization that favors greater transparency in government. We receive no government money, and wouldn’t accept any if it was offered. Instead, CapCon’s operations are supported entirely by contributions from private individuals and foundations who share our reformist ideas.

These ideas frequently put us on the opposite side of some well-connected and politically powerful special interests, many of which directly or indirectly receive government money, and have an interest in preserving government secrecy.

As seen recently in the politically charged environment in Wisconsin, some of these entities will use extreme tactics against those who oppose their interests .

Also like Sunshine Review, CapCon and its parent organization the Mackinac Center for Public Policy abide by the Donor’s Bill of Rights developed by several national professional organizations for charitable and philanthropic fundraisers. The policy is rooted in a landmark 1958 Supreme Court case, NAACP v . Alabama, in which the court ruled against forcing the civil rights organization to turn over its contributors' names to the state.

Although the potential consequences for our donors may be less severe than for Alabama NAACP contributors in the pre-Civil Rights Act South, we too have earned the animosity of powerful special interests whose past actions provide good reason for our supporters to want their privacy protected.


See also:

Politician Who Attacked Government Transparency Groups Gets 'Bitten Back'

Related Articles:

Half Of Able-Bodied Michigan Medicaid Expansion Enrollees Don’t Work

Michigan Auto Insurance Reform Would Mandate Nation’s Richest Injury Coverage

Michigan's Top Cop Could Lose $161,903 In Double Dipping Benefits If Ousted

Wayne County 'Jail Fail' Site Moves Closer To Subsidized Redevelopment

Kentucky Becomes Nation’s 27th Right-to-Work State

More Than 18,000 in Michigan Voted Without a Photo ID This Election