The Washington Supreme Court has struck down a law in that state meant to curb the number of medical malpractice lawsuits.

As an AP account put it, “The state Supreme Court has unanimously thrown out a 2006 law that requires an injured patient to get a certificate of merit from an expert before they can sue for medical malpractice.”

In its opinion, the court said, “We hold [the law] is unconstitutional because it unduly burdens the right of access to courts and violates the separation of powers.”

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

One alternative, suggested by the Cato Institute, would be to let patients enact tort reform by contract [PDF], which might be better than state-level restrictions on a person’s ability to address a grievance through the courts. In turn, state-level restrictions would be better (on the grounds of federalism, among other things), than getting Congress into the act.

Cross-posted from State House Call.


Related Articles:

Legacy Society Luncheon: The Morality of Capitalism

Legacy Society

You'd Be In Big Trouble If You Spent Like Uncle Sam

An Opportunity to Improve School Funding Equity?

State Health Policy Toolkit

Defined-Contribution Plans Help State Credit