• Mackinac Center for Public Policy
  • Issues
    • Bills & Votes
    • Budget & Taxes
    • Capitol News
    • Education
    • Labor
    • Legal Foundation
  • Right-to-Work
  • CapCon
  • MCLF
  • Votes
  • Databases
    • School
    • Labor
    • Tax Breaks
  • Share
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Email
    • Mobile
    • RSS
  • Home
  • Publications
    • Videos
    • Blog
    • Studies
    • More …
  • Events
  • Press Room
  • Site Map
  • About Us
    • Purpose
    • Contact
    • Personnel
    • Directions
    • Employment
    • More …
  • Contribute
Study

The Effects of Michigan’s Prevailing Wage Law

By Paul Kersey, published on Aug. 27, 2007

A key problem with the high-wage, high-skill rationale, as discussed in detail below, is that the balance of the evidence indicates that prevailing wage laws do relatively little to improve the productivity of construction labor, and in fact tend to make construction labor more expensive overall. This finding suggests that the artificial wage floor created by prevailing wage laws can result in higher costs for taxpayers.

SKU: S2007-09
Prevailing Wage cover

The Effects of Michigan’s Prevailing Wage Law

  • Foreword
  • Executive Summary
  • Introduction
  • The Michigan Prevailing Wage Law
  • Prevailing Wage Laws in Other States
  • The Federal Davis-Bacon Act
  • Rationales for Preserving the Prevailing Wage
  • The Effects of Michigan’s Prevailing Wage Law
    • The Decline of the Union Movement in Michigan
    • Prevailing Wage and Construction Industry Compensation
    • Another Perspective: Prevailing Wages and the Larger Work Force
    • Prevailing Wage, Productivity and Cost-Effectiveness
    • Workplace Safety and Quality of Construction
    • Difficulties for Bidders
    • Overall Cost of Construction
  • Experience of Michigan and Other Jurisdictions
  • The Overall Cost of the Prevailing Wage for Michigan Taxpayers
  • Solutions to the Prevailing Wage Problem
  • Conclusion
  • Appendix A
  • Appendix B
  • Acknowledgments
  • About the Author
  • Endnotes

More by Paul Kersey

Proposal 2 of 2012: An Assessment
There Are Alternatives to PA4 ...

Also Available As

  • pdf

Tools

  • Email
  • Print
  • Order

Share More …

Mackinac Center
  • Home
  • Search
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Contribute
  • Terms of Use
  • ©2007
    Mackinac Center for Public Policy
  • Phone: 989-631-0900
  • Publications and Sites
  • This Week at Mackinac
  • Michigan Capitol Confidential
  • MichiganVotes
  • Michigan Education Digest
  • Studies Videos
  • Mackinac Center Legal Foundation
  • The Overton Window
  • MichiganScience
  • Give
  • Learn how you can help the Mackinac Center provide incisive, accurate and timely analysis of critical policy issues.
  • Connect
  • Sign up for email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Copyright © 2007 Mackinac Center for Public Policy
www.mackinac.org