|
Program |
Gross
Appropriation |
Appropriation Breakdown
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correctional Facilities |
$879,541,100[59] |
$6,027,800 from
Interdepartmental |
|
Administration; Correctional |
|
Grants; |
|
Facilities Clinical Operations |
|
$544,000 from
Federal Funds; |
|
|
|
$870,018,500
from GF/GP; |
|
|
|
$2,950,800 from
Special Revenue Funds |
Program Description:
The state currently operates a number of correction camps
and 30 penal facilities: Alger Maximum Correctional Facility; Baraga Maximum
Correctional Facility; Brooks Correctional Facility; Carson City Correctional
Facility; Chippewa Correctional Facility; Cotton Correctional Facility; Florence
Crane Correctional Facility; Egeler Correctional Facility; Handlon Michigan
Training Unit; Harrison Correctional Facility; Huron Valley Correctional
Facility; Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility; Ionia Temporary Facility; Kinross
Correctional Facility; Lakeland Correctional Facility; Macomb Correctional
Facility; Marquette Branch Prison; Michigan Reformatory; Mid-Michigan Temporary
Facility; Mound Correctional Facility; Muskegon Correctional Facility; Oaks
Maximum Correctional Facility; Riverside Correctional Facility; Ryan
Correctional Facility; Saginaw Correctional Facility; Scott Correctional
Facility; Standish Maximum Correctional Facility; State Prison of Southern
Michigan; Thumb Correctional Facility; Western Wayne Correctional Facility.
Recommended Action:
Several states, including Florida, Kentucky, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, and Texas, have successfully contracted out all aspects of the
management of prison operations, at a savings to the taxpayers of those states.
Indeed, as author Wayne Calabrese has written, "cost comparisons have been made
that clearly indicate that privatization of correctional facilities leads to
significant savings," while "[t]he quality of services delivered by privatized
corrections has, in the main, been equal or superior to the quality of
correctional services delivered by the public sector."[60]
Here in Michigan, according to Department director Kenneth
L. McGinnis:
[T]he MDOC is proceeding with privatization of several
major funcations within its facilities. Health care services have been
privatized at five prisons in the last year, resulting in a one-year savings of
$600,000 to the department. This year all specialty care for prisoners will be
placed under a managed care contract at a projected savings of $6-8 million.
Food production at the Jackson complex should be privatized by the end of FY96.
Plans are being finalized for the privatization of the education programs within
the Department. These and other efforts at privatization are the culmination of
four years of negotiation with the Attorney General and the Civil Service
Commission who has to authorize and sanction such efforts.[61]
In a report published by the University of Florida's Center
for Studies in Criminology and Law, Charles W. Thomas examined available data on
45 privately managed correctional facilities. And of the private facilities
capable of cost comparison with public counterparts, all ten evidenced cost
savings--ranging from 10.71 percent to 52.23 percent.[62]
Thus, if the state of Michigan, through privatization, only experienced the
average savings in costs that these facilities did, 31.47 percent, a savings of
$276,791,584 could be realized, and appropriations could be reduced from
$879,541,100 to $602,749,516.
The progress made by the Department of Corrections toward
privatization is significant and encouraging. The Department should move as
rapidly as possible to fully privatize where appropriate, including the design,
construction, and management of all Michigan penal institutions. The evidence is
in: the private sector can do a more cost-efficient and higher quality job than
can the state in this area.[63]