Posted: Jan. 29, 2001
   
  Advanced Search


Full size: cover illustration

The Case for Choice in Schooling:




 

Myth #1: School choice will lead to the social, racial, and economic stratification of students in American schools

Download PDF of the larger publication

The idea that the current government school system is a "melting pot" of students from diverse backgrounds and that school choice will somehow disrupt it is false.  Government schools in fact rarely represent a broad cross-section of the American population, and there is little or no evidence to suggest that schools-of-choice are or will be any less diverse than their government counterparts.

 The Facts:

  • Public schools are the most segregated schools in America.  The current system—whereby government assigns students to schools based on the neighborhoods in which they live—already has created a stratified school environment.  Government schools are stratified by race and income because, as sociologist James Coleman discovered in his research, students are assigned to schools according to where they live.[97]  Government schools therefore ensure stratification of students because districts are drawn geographically and neighborhoods are typically organized around socioeconomic factors.  School choice removes or reduces the importance of geographic and political boundaries, thereby encouraging greater social, racial, and economic integration of students. 

  • Private schools are racially, economically, and socially diversified.  Many inner-city private schools already reflect greater diversity than their government counterparts because their student bodies are not determined by arbitrary political boundaries, but rather by parents of every background seeking the best education for their children. Researchers Jay P. Greene and Nicole Mellow of the University of Texas at Austin found that "private schools tend to offer a more racially integrated environment than do public schools." In their study, Integration Where it Counts: A Study of Racial Integration in Public and Private School Lunchrooms, Greene and Mellow argue that one of the primary reasons for this fact is that public schools tend to replicate the segregation found in their attendance areas while private schools tend to draw from a variety of neighborhoods.[98]



[97]     James S. Coleman and Thomas Hoffer, Public and Private High Schools: The Impact of Communities (New York: Basic Books, 1987).

[98]     Jay P. Greene and Nicole Mellow, "Integration Where it Counts: A Study of Racial Integration in Public and Private School Lunchrooms," University of Texas at Austin, 20 August 1998.

Publication: Study

Next page: Myth #2: School choice violates the separation of church and state

This text is part of the larger publication:
The Case for Choice in Schooling:

Download PDF of the larger publication


Print articleEmail this articleSync article to your PDA using AvantGoAdd to shopping cartDownload article

Top of this pageHome pageAdvanced Search



 
Print articleEmail this articleSync article to your PDA using AvantGoAdd to shopping cartDownload article

Thursday, August 21, 2008
Michigan Education Digest
DPS scholarships, Brighton budget, teacher quality.

 

  Processed in 0.05 seconds

 

Would you like to see more information like this? Learn how you can help the Mackinac Center provide incisive, accurate and timely analysis of critical policy issues.

Copyright © 2001 Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Terms of Use | Contribute | Contact Us