Gubernatorial Fact Check

$10 Billion Claim Is Exaggerated

In presenting her executive budget, Gov. Jennifer Granholm stated, "I have cut more state spending than any governor in Michigan history, having resolved more than $10 billion in deficits since 2003." It's unnecessary to state that one of those budgets was "resolved" with a $1.4 billion tax hike — not exactly cutting more than anyone — but even the $10 billion is an overstatement.

The state spent $41.2 billion in fiscal year 2002. Adjusted for inflation, cutting $10 billion would mean that the state should've spent $39.1 billion in fiscal 2009. In reality, state appropriations were $47.9 billion in 2009.

The common response is that this includes federal revenue. Even assuming that is what the governor meant, it is still inaccurate. Michigan received $26.1 billion in just state revenues in fiscal year 2002. Adjusting for inflation, a $10 billion cut would mean that the state would have spent only $21.1 billion in 2009. It spent $26.3 billion.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Despite the governor's claims of cutting Michigan government, the state continues to grow. Exaggerated budget claims serve only to ignore the many ways that Michigan can trim its budget.


Related Articles:

Legacy Society Luncheon: The Morality of Capitalism

Wayne Co. Schools’ $80 Million Annual Tax Hike Won’t Cover Pensions

Legacy Society

Metro Detroit Transit Tax Assumes Funding From State and Feds That May Never Come

You'd Be In Big Trouble If You Spent Like Uncle Sam

An Opportunity to Improve School Funding Equity?