Stakes High In Special Education Disputes, With Legal Costs To Match

Utica Schools have spent almost $300,000 defending treatment of one student

Editor's Note: The story has been corrected to note that the mother suing Utica Community Schools has paid for legal representation.

Over a five-year period, Utica Community Schools paid one law firm approximately $295,000 in documented legal fees related to a lawsuit brought by a single mother over how the school district wanted to educate her son, who has autism. That's according to legal invoices obtained through an open records request for documents from Utica public schools.

The mother won a number of court rulings between September 2012 and December 2017, but the school district has appealed those rulings, and the case is now in federal district and appeals courts.

Utica is the state’s second largest school district and is also experiencing financial stress. A December 2017 report characterized it as “on the path to financial disaster.”

The mother’s disagreement with the district began when it allegedly refused to abide by a previously agreed-upon education plan for her son. Instead, it placed him in an educational setting reportedly meant for children with much more severe mental impairments.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Federal law requires public schools to create an education plan for students with disabilities, offering them appropriate services in the least restrictive environment. When parents and school districts disagree about the plan for a specific student, they can either have the case decided by the Michigan Department of Education, or by an administrative law judge.

In the Utica case, the student's mother is paying for legal assistance. Fighting a school district willing to spend nearly $300,000 is a financial drain.

Utica isn’t the only school district willing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting parents over the education plans of disabled children. Walled Lake’s school district spent nearly $200,000 in legal fees over 18 months (May 2016 to October 2017) defending its decision to put two boys into a classroom for children with cognitive impairments.


Related Articles:

A “Not Welcome” Sign for Special-Needs Students

Special Needs Families Deserve Transparency

More to Charter Special Ed Gap than Meets the Eye

Brian Calley Talks State Government

Detroit School District Still Needs Teachers