James M. Hohman
Assistant Director of Fiscal Policy
James M. Hohman is assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. He holds a degree in economics from Northwood University in Midland, Mich.
Tools
By James M. Hohman
EITC 'Improper Payments' Costing Taxpayers
One more reason Michigan should drop program. … more
Elkhart Continues its Economic Growth
Indiana border county outpaces national job growth. … more
The Common Ploy for More Funding
Universities want even more tax dollars. … more
Right-to-Work States Have Higher Incomes
When adjusted for cost-of-living. … more
Multiplier Analyses Often Abused
They don't justify taking the dollar in the first place. … more
A Matter of Perspective
National recovery data looks different depending on the chart. … more
The False Social Concerns About Right-to-Work
Poverty, lack of insurance not higher in right-to-work states. … more
Union Rates Not Dropping Faster In RTW States
Right-to-work not to blame for fewer union members. … more
The Michigan 'Truth Squad' Problem With Facts
Fact-checking group gives in to partisan bent. … more
Proposal 1 of 2012: The Referendum on Public Act 4
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy recently published “Proposal 1 of 2012: The Referendum on Public Act 4,” which addresses Proposal 1 on the Nov. 6, 2012 ballot, also referred to as the “emergency manager” referendum.
The study examines the claim that local control will diminish if Proposal 1 passes and Public Act 4 is nullified. Public Act 4 had provided expanded powers to state-appointed emergency managers of local governments and school districts that are in a state of serious “fiscal stress or “fiscal emergency.” The study determined that the question in Michigan has not been whether state-appointed managers or court-appointed receivers may replace local elected officials in running a local unit of government; they have been able to do so for decades. The only question is whether state government will participate in the effort to avoid local fiscal insolvency and how it will do so.
The Policy Brief was authored by James M. Hohman, assistant director of Fiscal Policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. … more
The study examines the claim that local control will diminish if Proposal 1 passes and Public Act 4 is nullified. Public Act 4 had provided expanded powers to state-appointed emergency managers of local governments and school districts that are in a state of serious “fiscal stress or “fiscal emergency.” The study determined that the question in Michigan has not been whether state-appointed managers or court-appointed receivers may replace local elected officials in running a local unit of government; they have been able to do so for decades. The only question is whether state government will participate in the effort to avoid local fiscal insolvency and how it will do so.
The Policy Brief was authored by James M. Hohman, assistant director of Fiscal Policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. … more
Proposal 2 of 2012: An Assessment
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy recently published “Proposal 2 of 2012: An Assessment,” which addresses Proposal 2 on the Nov. 6, 2012 ballot, also referred to as the “collective bargaining” amendment.
The study examines how the proposed constitutional amendment would enshrine collective bargaining in the state constitution, which would allow government union collective bargaining agreements to invalidate numerous state laws meant to improve the quality of public services and would likely negate a projected $1.6 billion in annual taxpayer savings.
The Policy Brief was co-authored by Vernuccio and other Mackinac Center analysts: Senior Legal Analyst Patrick J. Wright, Executive Vice President Michael J. Reitz and Assistant Fiscal Policy Director James M. Hohman. Also co-authoring was Paul Kersey, director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute. … more
The study examines how the proposed constitutional amendment would enshrine collective bargaining in the state constitution, which would allow government union collective bargaining agreements to invalidate numerous state laws meant to improve the quality of public services and would likely negate a projected $1.6 billion in annual taxpayer savings.
The Policy Brief was co-authored by Vernuccio and other Mackinac Center analysts: Senior Legal Analyst Patrick J. Wright, Executive Vice President Michael J. Reitz and Assistant Fiscal Policy Director James M. Hohman. Also co-authoring was Paul Kersey, director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute. … more
Proposal 1 Has Nothing to Do With Local Control
Opponents should focus on fiscal responsibility. … more
$1.6 Billion in Savings Lost Under Prop 2
The financial impact of enshrined collective bargaining. … more
Policymakers Still Tripped Up By Pension Transition Costs
"Transition costs" and "plunging credit ratings" are red herrings to pension reform. … more
Fix the Real Problem of the Pension System
Politicians to blame for unfunded liabilities. … more
House GOP Hides Behind Rigged 'Study'
Punting on pension reform keeps the burden on taxpayers. … more
Outsourcing Isn't the Problem
Special favors to bring jobs back not the answer. … more
Comparing Apples to Lemons in Pension Reform
Legislature needs to be transparent about costs. … more
House Pension Reform Savings are Phony
The Senate's plan is much more realistic. … more

