Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws Need Reform

Transparency, rule of law should be the focus

A Michigan medical marijuana card.

A recent CapCon story and video documented the Michigan State Police using civil asset forfeiture to freeze the bank accounts and take the property of two men for months without even charging them with a crime.

Forfeiture is a complicated process, but essentially allows for an end-run around what most people see as basic constitutional rights. Michigan should join other states, like North Carolina or Minnesota, in requiring a criminal conviction before assets can be seized. That won’t happen anytime soon, but in the meantime there are other reforms that politicians should consider during this lame-duck period.

The bill with the greatest chance is House Bill 5081, which was passed out of the House Oversight Committee last June. It now sits on the House floor. This bill would provide more transparency for the assets seized — something extremely important because law enforcement agencies use seized assets to supplement their budgets.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

There are other proposals that would help change the incentives in place right now. That’s the key to respecting individual rights and a strong rule of law.


Related Articles:

Michigan Should End Civil Asset Forfeiture

Michigan Forfeiture Laws Improving, But State Transparency Still Falls Behind

Key Part of Civil Asset Forfeiture Law Ruled Unconstitutional

Michigan Must Stop Keeping Peoples’ Property Without Conviction

Michigan Needs To Stop Charging Residents To Get Their Property Back

Now People Won't Have to Pay a Bond to Recover Their Stuff from Police