I suppose it’s encouraging that advocates of a government health insurance company (“public option”) invoke the word “competition.”

The Wall Street Journal makes a point that is so obvious I wish I had mentioned it here before: OK, if you’re for competition, how about enhancing competition among insurance companies by letting them sell across state lines?

I have read critics of yet another government health program say “we don’t need it; we have plenty of competition. There are over 1,000 insurance companies in this country.”

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

It’s true enough that there are a large number of insurance companies. But they are sheltered by state lines, so the number of companies selling in a given state are much less than 1,000.

Furthermore, most people have not 1,000 companies to choose from or even 10. Instead, they face a Hobson’s choice: The company and plan chosen by their employer. Oh, perhaps they can choose between the equivalent of eggshell white and pearl (deductible levels). But that’s about it – and government, through the federal tax code, effectively creates that situation.

(Cross-posted from State House Call.)

~~~~~

Related Articles:

Worker’s Choice: Freeing Unions and Workers From Forced Representation

How Pensions Are Bankrupting Cities and States and How to Fix It

Statewide Student Test Scores Are In and the News Isn't Good

Voters’ Support for School Choice Remains Strong

New Survey Finds Broad Support For School Choice In Michigan

Trump and Clinton are Both Wrong: Free Trade is Good for People

Share