You know the expression about taking something with a grain of salt? When it comes to advocates of new government health programs making estimates of how much their dreams will cost, you might want to find the Sam’s Club-sized version.

Mitch Pearlstein, president of the Center of the American Experiment, dusted off an Op-Ed he wrote during the days of debates over HillaryCare, the the insights are still instructive.

Well, it’s only three years past 1990, and the combined Medicare portion of payroll taxes today totals 2.9 percent, not 1 percent. This is a disparity of 290 percent over Medicare’s original payroll tax. It’s more than 1,100 percent increase over the one-quarter of one percent combined payroll tax presumed in Newsweek in 1962.

That was 1993, and the numbers have become even worse since then. That’s sobering, considering that so many people think that Medicare is a model to follow.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

(Cross-posted from State House Call.)

~~~~~

Related Articles:

Worker’s Choice: Freeing Unions and Workers From Forced Representation

How Pensions Are Bankrupting Cities and States and How to Fix It

Study 'Segregates' School District Borders By Ignoring Key Data

Legacy Society

The Most Important State Election This November: Michigan's Next House Speaker

Petty Restrictions on Tobacco Endanger Respect for Law

Share