John Calfee has a great column in the WSJ today tackling some of the major myths regarding a public “option” for health insurance — what he calls “Fannie Mae health care.”

President Obama and most congressional Democrats say they want to preserve private health insurance. They also want to add a “public plan” to compete with private insurance plans. Their basic argument is that a public plan would offer needed competition, save money through low administrative costs and zero profits, realize greater economies of scale, and be a superior negotiator of the prices of medical services and technology.

The first three arguments are bogus. The fourth argument is only half-bogus — but the half that isn’t reveals a great danger: If a public plan is inserted into private insurance markets, the American health-care system could rapidly evolve into a single-payer system, which would have devastating effects on R&D for new medical technology.

Definitely worth a read.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

~~~~~

Related Articles:

Friedman Legacy Day

Planning for Life Workshop – Suttons Bay, MI

July 1, 2016 MichiganVotes Weekly Roll Call Report

Lawsuit Challenges Forced Payments for Tourism Bureaus

Michigan Adequacy Study Shows the State Already Spends Plenty on Education

Mackinac Center Weighs in on State’s Education Adequacy Study

Share