John Calfee has a great column in the WSJ today tackling some of the major myths regarding a public “option” for health insurance — what he calls “Fannie Mae health care.”

President Obama and most congressional Democrats say they want to preserve private health insurance. They also want to add a “public plan” to compete with private insurance plans. Their basic argument is that a public plan would offer needed competition, save money through low administrative costs and zero profits, realize greater economies of scale, and be a superior negotiator of the prices of medical services and technology.

The first three arguments are bogus. The fourth argument is only half-bogus — but the half that isn’t reveals a great danger: If a public plan is inserted into private insurance markets, the American health-care system could rapidly evolve into a single-payer system, which would have devastating effects on R&D for new medical technology.

Definitely worth a read.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

~~~~~

Related Articles:

Worker’s Choice: Freeing Unions and Workers From Forced Representation

How Pensions Are Bankrupting Cities and States and How to Fix It

Study 'Segregates' School District Borders By Ignoring Key Data

Legacy Society

The Most Important State Election This November: Michigan's Next House Speaker

Petty Restrictions on Tobacco Endanger Respect for Law

Share