"Everything must be on the table."

"There must be shared sacrifice."

I keep hearing such pronouncements from voices both inside and outside of government who characterize themselves as "fiscally conservative." So why are many of them criticizing school spending cuts enacted by Gov. Jennifer Granholm through either line-item veto or executive order?

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

If one just looks just at the effect of the Governor's actions and ignores the motivations (the administration has all but admitted using school spending as a "hostage" to its demands for tax hikes) Ms. Granholm looks like a fiscal conservative's hero right now.

So where's the love?

For that matter, where's the love for taxpayers from the 12 Republicans and 62 Democrats who voted yesterday to appropriate $159 million in federal "stimulus" money being reserved for next year's school budget, and another $59 million the House proposes getting from various tax hikes, to "undo" school spending reductions?

The tax hikes (part of a proposed "Michigan Future Fund") include a proposed $300 million doctors tax, a $55 million suspension of income tax personal exemption inflation indexing, raising certain business taxes (by repealing deductions), a $43 million tobacco tax hike, and more.

~~~~~

Related Articles:

"Rich States, Poor States" Presentation – Traverse City, MI

Friedman Legacy Day

Detroit Was Just the Beginning: The Crisis of City Pension Systems in Michigan

Legacy Society

Trust Parents or Political Appointees to Choose Best School for Kids?

July 22, 2016 MichiganVotes Weekly Roll Call Report