When Michigan State University officials refused to comment on a plagiarism investigation directed at a professor, Michael Van Beek decided to put in a Freedom of Information Act request to find out what was going on.
Van Beek, the education policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, discovered the alleged plagiarism in a MSU study last year. He was shocked to find out what was returned by MSU in answer to the FOIA request. There was a two-page e-mail completely redacted as well as entire paragraphs from other e-mails where little was left except the person’s name, title and contact information.
“It basically is a useless document that they gave us back,” Van Beek said. “If this is meeting a FOIA request, it definitely changes the expectations of how public bodies can be held accountable through FOIA.”
In one instance, an e-mail states: “Bob, I am concerned about (redacted). It is certainly (redacted). Can we talk about this. I think it will not (redacted). Moreover, (redacted). Moreover, it demonstrates (redacted).”
Patrick Wright, senior legal counsel for the Mackinac Center said the FOIA’ed documents look “fairly ridiculous.” Wright said the Mackinac Center is reviewing its legal options.
One FOIA expert said redaction has become more prevalent.
Robin Luce-Herrmann, general counsel for the Michigan Press Association, handles media problems with FOIA.
“One of the more frequent problems now is redaction,” Luce-Herrmann said. “Redaction wasn’t something I was being called about as much three to four years ago.”
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy alleged that Sharif Shakrani, senior scholar at the Education Policy Center at MSU and a professor of measurement and quantitative methods, plagiarized more than 800 words in a study about school consolidation. The study was later amended to acknowledge the sources Shakrani used for his report that weren’t previously included.
MSU launched an investigation last fall that it said could take a year to complete.
To see a few select excerpts from the FOIA response, click here or here.
To see the full FOIA response, click here.
~~~~~
See also:
Plagiarism Double Standards at Michigan State
Analysis: Consolidating School Districts Won’t Save Michigan $600 Million
School Consolidation Is No ‘Silver Bullet’
Possible Plagiarism in MSU/Newspaper Report on School Consolidation
Main Source for MSU School Consolidation Study Says His Data Was Misapplied
Plagiarism, Flawed MSU Studies, and the People vs. the Ruling Class
Tight security locked out dozens of anti-right-to-work protesters from the State Capitol as Governor Snyder was delivering his "State of the State" address. Protesters tried to disrupt the speech by banging and chanting outside the building.
Most Popular
FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS — OFTEN FAMILY MEMBERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
opinion May 25, 2012
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting.
The first counter tallies SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the Governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
For more information, visit:
Comments