Home
Search
Site Map
About Us
Contribute
Advanced Search
Mr. Patrick J. Wright
(Click to enlarge)
Mackinac Center Amicus Curiae Brief in Michigan Department of Transportation v. Tomkins
About This Ducument
Executive Summary
Jurisdictional Statement/Statement of Question Involved
Introduction
Statement of Facts
Argument/Standard of Review
Merits
(this page)
1. Relevant law and constitutional provisions
2. The common-understanding doctrine and takings
3. Spiek and highway effects
4. The instant case at the Court of Appeals
5. Common-understanding factors
Conclusion
Relief Requested
About the Author
Posted: Apr. 11, 2008
Merits
Download PDF of the larger publication
Contents
1. Relevant law and constitutional provisions
2. The common-understanding doctrine and takings
3. Spiek and highway effects
4. The instant case at the Court of Appeals
5. Common-understanding factors
a. Justice Cooley’s scholarly writings
b. Michigan case law
c. Constitutional convention activity
d. Federal case law
Publication:
Study
Next page:
1. Relevant law and constitutional provisions
This text is part of the larger publication:
Mackinac Center Amicus Curiae Brief in Michigan Department of Transportation v. Tomkins
Download PDF of the larger publication
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Michigan Education Digest
Online ed, Catholic schools, budget crunch.
