Search
Login
Register

Charter network growing, but not likely in Michigan soon

Kipp known for long hours, high test scores

Fri., February 29, 2008

The first question Michael Feinberg fielded was not about requiring school on Saturday, not about his schools’ high test scores and not about his budget.

Michael Feinberg, cofounder of the Knowledge is Power Program, told audience members at a charter school conference in Detroit that the best way to hold schools accountable is through school choice. (Photos by Josh Nunez)

The first question Feinberg fielded after his presentation about the Knowledge is Power Program was when and if it is coming to Detroit.

His answer? Detroit is welcome to get in line, just like everybody else.

A KIPP cofounder, Feinberg said that demand for KIPP schools has grown so much in the past 10 years that rather than scout the country for potential school sites, the program now requires applicants to come to it. With 57 schools in 17 states, two more scheduled to open this year and a growing list of philanthropic supporters, KIPP is becoming selective about its future.

In an address at the 10th annual Michigan Charter Schools Conference sponsored by the Michigan Association of Public School Academies in November 2007, Feinberg explained the KIPP model and how the foundation plans to "tip" public education.

KIPP sponsors a national network of free, open-enrollment public schools that offer a college preparatory program primarily to low-income minority populations. Most KIPP schools are fifth- through eighth-grade operations known for long hours, academic rigor and discipline.

High math scores in Houston and New York, the first KIPP sites, brought the model national attention. The day after a "60 Minutes" program about KIPP was broadcast in 1999, Feinberg received a telephone call from a California school administrator who said, "We want to order 15 KIPPs for next year, please."

Shortly after, Feinberg and cofounder Dave Levin partnered with the founders of Gap Inc., to establish the KIPP Foundation. Today the foundation works with groups to establish KIPP schools, and it also trains school leaders and teachers.

KIPP’s goal, Feinberg told the an audience in Cobo Hall, is to move into cities where detractors say the political, social and economic obstacles are too much for school systems to overcome and then to overcome those obstacles.

"We know we aren’t capable of KIPP-atizing all 50 million children in public education today. But we think we can contribute," Feinberg said. "Wherever people are making … excuses, we want to start schools there under the same conditions, to prove what can and should be happening across the board."

KIPP succeeds by opening locally controlled schools resting on five tenets: time on task, choice and commitment, power to lead, high expectations and measurable results.

The typical KIPP schedule requires students and teachers to be in school from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays. Students spend two to three hours on homework nightly and attend school on alternate Saturday mornings as well at least four weeks each summer.

"I don’t care if everything else is figured out perfectly," Feinberg said. "Wonderful teachers. Wonderful school leaders. Brand new buildings. If everything else is fixed and we still put on the clock (only) four or five hours a day for half a year, we’re setting the whole thing up for failure."

It’s not difficult to find teachers willing to put in those hours, Feinberg said, because the best teachers already are. For the extra time, KIPP pays teachers 15 to 20 percent more then the average surrounding districts.

"Every single school here in Detroit — and I don’t care how bad the school is — has at least got a handful of great teachers. There are a few cars in that parking lot at 7 in the morning and a few cars … at 5 in the afternoon. At KIPP, all the cars are there at 7 … and at 5."

Choice and Commitment

KIPP won’t open a school in a community without favorable charter school laws, Feinberg said, because parental choice is the surest way to improve a school.

"The most important accountability measure, beyond any test score … is the pitter patter of the kids’ feet," he said. "If they choose to come to our school, what are we doing to view the kid and the parent as our customers?"

It’s tough to find the balance between academic rigor and customer satisfaction, he acknowledged.

"We’ve got to push in a way that we aren’t pushing so hard that we’re pushing them out the door."

Some critics have said KIPP is doing just that, pointing to high attrition rates at some KIPP schools. If the students who leave KIPP are low achievers, then the program is not serving who it claims to serve, they said. Rather, it is serving motivated low-income students who already are higher achievers.

Other education researchers say that attrition is common among urban minority populations in any school because those populations are more transient in general. They also point out that KIPP’s highest attrition numbers are found, not unexpectedly, during the first year in new KIPP schools and that the attrition rate decreases over time. KIPP is now doing its own national analysis of attrition.

Power to lead

Too many school principals today are not school leaders; they are babysitters, Feinberg said.

"They’re told who will teach in their building. They cannot get rid of people. … They don’t have any real control over their budget dollars," he said. "No wonder they’re frustrated."

Every KIPP school is led by a director who has completed a year of KIPP training. That person has the freedom to hire and fire staff and make budget decisions, and then is held accountable for results, Feinberg said. In the few cases when a KIPP school has failed, it was because the wrong person was chosen as leader, he said.

"Great people make or break it, so what are we doing to attract great people … and what are we doing to find a quick exit strategy for the people who are not even mediocre?"

In return, KIPP teachers and leaders are expected to bring underperforming students up to and beyond grade level within two years. Every KIPP student is expected to attend college.

Overall, Feinberg said, KIPP has made its mark on education, but "we haven’t really tipped anything."

"We want to have an effect on the public education system the way Fed Ex had an effect on the U.S. Post Office," he said. "When Fed Ex got to 10 percent market share, that’s when the Post Office, a government monopoly, learned to do next-day air. So at the end of the day, Fed Ex didn’t hurt the Post Office. They made them better."

The charter school movement overall has not "tipped" education either, Feinberg said, in part because of quality control.

"The fact is that several of our brothers and sisters in the school movement have not started very good schools, and they’ve not been held accountable," he said. "It can’t just be about growth. It’s got to be about quality."

KIPP itself has revoked permission to use its name in five schools. Of those, three are now operating under other names and two have closed.

Asked about bringing KIPP to Detroit, Feinberg said that any group can file an application for a KIPP license, but they have to meet three core requirements — funding, facilities and freedom.

KIPP schools typically do not take in enough local and state revenue to cover the cost of running the school. One reason is that charter public schools typically receive less per-pupil funding than conventional public schools. Another is that KIPP has added costs due to the extended school day and school year. To make up the difference, which KIPP estimates at roughly $1,000 to $1,500 per student, KIPP schools must develop a fundraising plan and seek out additional revenue through public grants and private donations.

Even with the additional fundraising, however, KIPP spends less per student, on average, than most urban districts, according to the foundation.

Regarding facilities, Feinberg said they don’t have to be fancy, but zoning and other regulatory questions have to be resolved in advance. "Freedom" means there is a legal way — preferably a "healthy charter law" — for the school to open.

In Michigan, getting a charter would probably be the biggest obstacle for a group interested in opening a KIPP school, said Dan Quisenberry, president of the Michigan Association of Public School Academies. Michigan law caps the number of charter schools that can be authorized at state universities to 150. As of mid-December, he wasn’t aware of any organization planning to apply.

The KIPP Foundation confirmed that is has not received an application from Michigan to date, but said that it has been approached for information by a number of business and education leaders here. In any case, the earliest the foundation will accept new applications is this spring, for schools that would open in 2010.


Michigan Education Daily
Detroit Schools $45 million in debt, may see another state takeover >>
Tuition Tax Credit program signed into law in Georgia >>
Michigan students struggle to pass Algebra I >>
Oak Park chief of staff purchases personal shower, gym on school property >>
Dearborn charters struggle to keep up on state tests >>
Flint Schools pink slip another 28 employees >>
Grand Rapids Schools contract for custodial services. >>
Pinckney Community Schools is closing an elementary school >>
User Comments
Ferndale High School in Ferndale, Michigan succeeded in correcting the mistaken reporting of the Johns Hopkins University report that had included it as a "dropout factory" with poor "promoting power." The University researchers have acknowledged that Ferndale High School does not belong in this category and removed the school from the list because of the school district's high outward mobility (more students move out than move in during high school.). The high school has a three-year promoting power ration of 77% rather than the 50% reported in the Associated Press in October 2007, with the Class of 2006 having a 91% promoting power. Please visit Johns Hopkins' website for more clarification to see the "Schools Removed from the List of Weak Promoting Power High Schools: http://web.jhu.edu/CSOS/images/Removed_from_List_5_14_08.pdf .

Also, visit www.ferndaleschools.org for info about the school district. >>
So you're not going to admit an anti-MESSA bias?

*wink* >>
The links to the sources used in MED are so that people can read the entire article. MED provides a summary of what the media reports. A "further reading" is then included for those readers who wish to read more on a related topic. >>
And you don't simply "report" stories in the Education Digest. For example, in this story in question you link directly to a story where MESSA's accused of stonewalling, further bolstering the bias and claim that MESSA is doing something wrong here.

Your coyness is patronizing. >>
Michigan Education Digest is just that, a digest, which means it is a compilation of what is reported by other media. You may want to contact the Paw Paw newspaper and give them a copy of the questionnaire so they can do a follow-up story on the issue. Please keep us updated on that matter.
- Ed. >>
What the news article on MESSA conveniently leaves out is the intrusive nature of the questionnaire sent out in the Paw Paw district. It asks for--under threat of not being covered if you don't comply--your name, ss number, all family details, and a specific 14-question section on your medical history.

And there's a 3-page lawyer note attached to the survey that essentially says the company has the right to share this info with anyone they choose to do so.

Where's the ACLU when you need them?

It's a disgrace that a site like this would be so in bed with corporate interests that it would gladly back such an invasion of personal privacy.

And before you ask, yes I have indeed seen the survey. I have a copy of it. Why doesn't your site post THAT? >>
The article in the Kalamazoo Gazette that you linked to was incredibly biased in its presentation of the KRESA tax. Here's my reaction on our blog:


MORE LIES FROM THE RAG

Readers of the Kalamazoo Gazette have long been accustomed to its shilling for just about every proposed tax hike. In the world view of the Gazette, local governments and school districts are always strapped for cash, mainly because those stingy taxpayers are reluctant to fork over more of their wealth.

Even though readers are aware of this pro-tax bias, two articles in the March 16 paper are simply astonishing in their reckless disregard for the truth. The articles are supposed to be an analysis of how the KRESA enhancement tax has impacted funding for Kalamazoo County's nine local school districts. Remember, we are in the third, and last, year of the KRESA tax, passed by voters in 2005.

So what school funding time period does the articles examine? Get this: the two years before the tax was enacted, plus only the first two years after the tax was enacted. This is equivalent of saying you are going to write a history of the 20th Century, and then writing about the period from 1850 to 1950. Astonishing.

The two years before the tax was enacted were flat funding years for Michigan schools. The per-pupil grant from the state stayed the same for those two years at $6626 per pupil. That was the whole reason why the KRESA "enhancement" millage was put on the ballot by local schools in 2005.

So if you include these two depressed years, prior to the KRESA tax, into an analysis of the KRESA tax revenue increase, of course you're going to end up with a smaller increase of revenue.

Think that's the end of the articles' duplicity? Wrong. "On the revenue side, the Gazette found, increases in the state's per-pupil allocations have been undercut by enrollment declines. On the expense side, districts have faced sharp cost increases, most notably in the mandatory contribution to the school employees' retirement fund."

Yes, some school districts have had their revenue cut because their enrollment has dropped. Welcome to the real world. But guess what. If you have few students to teach, you should have fewer expenses in teaching them! What a concept! Unless, of course, you are the typical government bureaucrat who resists every effort to cut costs and cut unneeded personnel.

And the mandatory contribution to the school employees' retirement fund? We find out, buried later in the article, that the state of Michigan will actually cut what school districts have to pay into the retirement fund next year. Whoops, never mind.

"But fiscal analysts said the rate could increase to more than 20 percent in the near future," wails the article. Don't you love this? Tax apologists present these kinds of increases in retirement costs as something that is beyond our control; an act of God, like a meteor falling out of the sky.

But retirement costs are not beyond our control. If they go up, it's because public officials without a backbone cave in to the public sector unions and their demands for more compensation. Retirement costs do not have to go up--if we have public officials who are willing to grapple with the issue and get it under control

And we haven't even discussed the huge elephant in the room, the unnecessary costs that every school district pays for gold-plated MESSA health insurance.

That's the main frustrating thing about the entire argument by the KRESA tax pushers--who say basically that our costs keep going up, and there's nothing we can do about it, and that's why we have to raid your wallets. But taxpayers are providing plenty of funding for public schools. Now it's time for them to stop whining, and start producing.

--Ray Wilson
Kal. Co. Taxpayers Assoc.
http://www.kaltax.org
stoptaxes@kaltax.org >>
So are you trying to claim that none of the districts in the Washtenaw ISD currently have MESSA?

Seems that if things were so wonderful with the slush fund, they wouldn't be looking for alternatives. >>
So Wash is looking into pooling with 10 districts to create a cute mini-pool of savings? Lol...had they been in MESSA they could have been in a much larger pool than that.

lol... >>
As a school board member outside of Detroit, I am concerned about the lower standards that are created by the poor numbers coming out of southeast Michigan. While the situation in the Detroit area is unfortunate and complicated, the numbers from that area are possibly creating a false sense of accomplishment across the state.

How many times have you heard, "Our MEAP scores are 12% above the state average!" and wondered if that is really a good gauge? If the largest district in the state is only graduating 32% and my district graduates at the state average, then I can assume that my district is perfoming lower than most in the 81 counties outside of Detroit.

If the state released MEAP and graduation statistics that excluded the largest 3 districts and the smallest 30 districts, the numbers would be much higher and a more challenging benchmark for districts to aim for. >>