Graphic 6: Sample of Surveyed Contracts Containing
Prohibited Language per Public Act 103
School District |
Prohibited Language |
Brighton |
Evaluation of teachers specified and seniority-based decision making[127] |
Clarkston |
Vacancies and placement[128] |
Clintondale |
Seniority-based decision making[129] |
Eaton Rapids |
Language struck through without rationale or explanation[130] |
Farmington |
Seniority-based decision making[131] |
Fraser |
Evaluation and seniority-based decision making[132] |
Fruitport |
Guiding of decision making[133] |
Garden City |
Seniority-based decision making[134] |
Hamtramck |
Seniority-based decision making[135] |
Huron |
Seniority-based decision making[136] |
Jenison |
Seniority-based decision making[137] |
Lakeview |
Seniority-based decision making[138] |
Marysville |
Specified evaluation and seniority-based decision making[139] |
Mason (Ingham) |
Seniority-based decision making[140] |
Melvindale-North Allen Park |
Seniority-based decision making[141] |
Oak Park |
Seniority-based decision making[142] |
Riverview |
Evaluation and observation rigidly specified[143] |
Rochester |
Seniority-based decision making[144] |
Rockford |
Seniority-based decision making[145] |
Sault Ste. Marie |
Evaluation of teacher procedures specified[146] |
West Ottawa |
Seniority-based decision making[147] |
Wyandotte |
Seniority-based decision making[148] |
Wyoming |
Seniority-based decision making, evaluation and classroom observations rigidly specified[149] |