The media can often have a philosophical bias towards government “doing something” to “solve” societal problems. One recent example is how those in the press perceive a popular issue like education funding.

Two years ago, in the midst of an inefficient tax system and large fiscal deficit, the education budget was trimmed 2.4 percent. At the time, the typical headline was: “Schools face deep cuts under Gov. Rick Snyder’s budget plan.”

Today, the governor’s proposal is to increase school funding by 2 percent. The headline: “Snyder wants 2% bump in education funding.”

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

The “deep cuts” headlines have turned into a relaxed report about more government spending.

This is not about whether the specific cut to education funding was good or bad. The issue is the reaction — a built-in assumption that government should almost always grow while media critiques heat up whenever a program, no matter how inefficient, is actually cut.


Related Articles:

Potential Corporate Welfare Binge Risks Second Michigan ‘Lost Decade’

Gov. Rick Snyder Signs Bill Ending Film Subsidies

How Media Bias Works

Overcriminalization Study in The Detroit News

Unions and a Complicit Media in Pro-Paid Sick Time Campaign

There Was Never a $470 Per Pupil Education Funding Cut in Michigan