Status Quo School Defenders: Money For Me, But Bad For Thee
Current administrators making over $200K per year fight changes to the system
One of the consistent talking points against education reform bills that have been proposed has been that they open the door for “profiteers” to take over public education.
However, a look at the compensation (salaries, benefits and other perks) of some of the most vocal critics shows they are doing quite well in the business relationships they have with conventional public school districts.
Here’s a look at five people who are compensated at about $200,000 a year or more with a big hand from taxpayers through relationships with conventional public schools.
Salary information was gathered from documents listed online in each organization’s financial reports or was supplied by the school district.
CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, executive director of the Michigan Education Special Services Association: $293,552 compensation (2011)
MESSA is a third-party administrator for health insurance for public school employees and is affiliated with the Michigan Education Association, the state's largest teacher union. Williams has an annual salary of $238,172. MESSA’s revenues for its insurance increased from $1.22 billion in 2010 to $1.24 billion in 2011.
VICKIE MARKAVITCH, superintendent of the Oakland Intermediate School District: $285,965 compensation (2012)
Markavitch makes $190,965 a year as a salary on top of a $65,000 a year pension. Markavitch retired and then was rehired by the district as superintendent. She has been one of the most outspoken critics against the education reform bills. She said the bills would have "public tax dollars profiting Wall Street."
PATRICIA GREEN, superintendent of the Ann Arbor Public Schools: $273,551 compensation (2012)
Green's annual salary was $245,000 in 2012. She was critical of the educational reform bills because she said they would expand charter schools and hurt funding for conventional school districts.
STEVE COOK, president of the Michigan Education Association: $219,376 compensation (2012)
Cook said that charter schools pay “private companies” that were “out to make a profit …”
The MEA gets the majority of its money from dues or agency fees collected from its members. The MEA’s payments for employees’ benefits increased from $21.6 million in 2011 to $24.1 million in 2012, an increase of 11.5 percent. Cook's salary in 2011 was $182,154.
WILLIAM MAYES, executive director of the non-profit Michigan Association of School Administrators: $198,016 compensation (2011)
Mayes was critical of the education reform bills, saying they allowed “profiteers” to take taxpayer dollars. His annual salary in 2011 was $150,059.
MASA’s mission is “continuous improvement of public education.” It funds itself by charging school districts a membership fee to belong as well as charging for two educational conferences it puts on.
MASA’s payments for employee benefits and compensation increased from $2.1 million in 2010 to 2.7 million in 2011, an increase of 30.5 percent.
~~~~~
See also:
Public Schools: 'Profit' Bad For Others, Good For Us
Administrator Group Rails Against Education 'Profiteers;' Makes Millions Off Schools
Tight security locked out dozens of anti-right-to-work protesters from the State Capitol as Governor Snyder was delivering his "State of the State" address. Protesters tried to disrupt the speech by banging and chanting outside the building.
Most Popular
FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS — OFTEN FAMILY MEMBERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
opinion May 25, 2012
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting.
The first counter tallies SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the Governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
For more information, visit:
Comments