A school district in Michigan that gets 18 percent of its student body via the state's schools of choice program appears to have attacked legislation supporting expanded parental choice when it comes to charter and cyber schools in a resolution.
It raises the question of whether school district officials only believe in a parent’s right to choose a school if it is their district, said Michael Van Beek, education policy director for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
The Berkley School District Board of Education passed a resolution that appears to attack charter public schools, although the school board president denied that in an email.
The resolution states legislative actions have favored “private-sector vendor’s access to public dollars” and criticized legislation for having “no expectation of transparency and accountability as it establishes unlimited for-profit charters and cyber–schools whose governing bodies will or may be located in other states …”
Berkley School Board President Marc Katz, however, said the resolution wasn’t about opposing charter schools.
“The Berkley School Board in their resolution did not say that they were opposed to charter schools, what they said was that charter schools should have to play by the same rules that traditional public schools have to play by,” Katz wrote in an email.
Berkley had 878 students who attended the district through the state's schools of choice option in the fall of 2010. The total student body was about 4,700.
“The district is benefiting from parents having more choice,” Van Beek said. “There is no logical reason why parents should only be able to choose between Berkley and the school district next door. It’s sort of a ‘choice for me, but not for thee’ situation.”
~~~~~
See also:
Berkley School District: Response
Public School District 'Strikes Out' on Criticism of Charter Schools
Charter School Demand Continues to Rise
The Republicans Who Blocked Charter School Choice
Commentary: Research Shows Parental Choice Works
Parents Pin Hopes on Charter School Lottery
Tight security locked out dozens of anti-right-to-work protesters from the State Capitol as Governor Snyder was delivering his "State of the State" address. Protesters tried to disrupt the speech by banging and chanting outside the building.
Most Popular
FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS — OFTEN FAMILY MEMBERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
opinion May 25, 2012
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting.
The first counter tallies SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the Governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
For more information, visit:
Comments