The Macomb Intermediate School District sent out a brochure explaining why it needed a $27 million special education millage that is set to be voted on Nov. 8.
There are a few claims that bear a closer look.
The brochure claims the 21 local school districts and the Macomb Intermediate School District are losing $103 million annually compared to 2008.
The 21 local school districts brought in $1.232 billion combined in total general fund revenue in 2007-08. That increased to $1.248 billion in 2008-09 and then dropped to $1.179 billion in 2009-10, the latest year financial data is available from the Michigan Department of Education. That means the districts saw an overall combined decrease of $37 million the past two years when compared to 2007-08 revenue levels.
The Macomb Intermediate School District’s total revenue dropped from $179.9 million in 2007-08 to $177.1 million in 2009-10.
But Macomb County’s local school districts also have fewer students. Enrollment in the 21 districts is about 1,100 less compared to 2007-08.
The brochure also states, “If approved, local districts would receive additional funds for special education programs. This would reduce financial pressure on local district’s general operating fund, freeing up money for general education programs.”
But is revenue really the issue?
Michael Van Beek, education policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, points out that spending has actually increased for those 21 school districts. It went from $1.199 billion in 2007-08 to $1.242 billion in 2009-10.
“They are trying to sell this millage based on declining revenue when the reality may be increased spending,” Van Beek said. “That’s really the question: Is the problem declining revenue or increased spending?”
Macomb Intermediate School District officials didn’t respond to emails seeking comment on the brochure’s claims.
~~~~~
See also:
Coverage of School District Claiming Cuts
Five Easy Questions to Ask School Officials
The 32 Percent Teacher Pay Hikes at Birmingham Schools
When School Fee Hikes Count as ‘Budget Cuts’
Schools Use Creative Accounting to Exaggerate Fiscal Challenges
How $10 Million Spending Increases Become K-12 Budget Cuts
Carman-Ainsworth Schools: Multi-Million-Dollar Deficits and 6.7 Percent Raises
The 'Real World' vs. Public School Budget Cuts
Clarkston Average Teacher Salary Beats Inflation by $10K Over Last Decade
L’Anse Creuse: Cuts Claimed While Spending Is Up; Teachers Pay Zero for Health Benefits
Rochester Schools Reduce 6.5 to 7.5 Percent Raises by Half-Point - Declares Budget Cut
What Does the Average Teacher in Ann Arbor Really Make?
Bay City Public Schools Claims $24 Million Cut, Budget Continues to Grow
Will the Snyder K-12 Plan Really Cause 40-Student Classrooms in Novi?
Spending Mysteries at Utica Schools
Rochester Schools Raise Pay, Report Cuts, and Blame Governor
Does the Lansing School District Reall Pay 'Below the Poverty Line' for Teachers?
West Michigan School Super Claims Budget Cuts - But Do the Numbers Add Up?
The Compensation of An “Unappreciated” and “Devalued” Spanish Teacher
'Budget Cut' Doesn't Mean the Same Thing to Public and Private Sectors
Decade of Cuts Is Claimed by School District Giving 14 Percent Raises Over 24 Months
Tight security locked out dozens of anti-right-to-work protesters from the State Capitol as Governor Snyder was delivering his "State of the State" address. Protesters tried to disrupt the speech by banging and chanting outside the building.
Most Popular
FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS — OFTEN FAMILY MEMBERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
opinion May 25, 2012
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting.
The first counter tallies SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the Governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
For more information, visit:
Comments