Although the state doesn't have the money to continue the Pure Michigan advertising campaign, one Mackinac Center For Public Policy expert argues it can continue if the private tourism industry pays for it.
The state's Pure Michigan advertising campaign was cancelled, according to the Detroit News, as the state doesn't have the money for it this fall. The ads featured the voice of actor Tim Allen and touted the attractive many of the outdoor recreational activities of the state.
Michael LaFaive, director of the Mackinac Center's Morey Fiscal Policy Initiative, has argued that the Pure Michigan campaign should be paid for by the people it directly benefits — the tourism industry.
A 2010 study reported that the state got a $2.23 rate of return on every $1 it invested in tourism advertising.
Yet, despite this supposed rate of return, the tourism industry didn't believe advertising was something it wanted to pay for. LaFaive pointed to a recent tourism industry report titled "Michigan Tourism Strategic Plan" that stated:
There is absolutely no industry support for a broad-based industry self-assessment approach to generate sufficient monies to fund Travel Michigan. Last year, TICOM (Tourism Industry Coalition of Michigan) created a special task force to explore such an approach. Without exception, representatives from a variety of tourism industry segments indicated their members and/or Boards would strongly oppose such an approach.
"In other words, tourism industry members determined that this type of promotion does not provide a worthy return on investment if they have to pay for it," LaFaive wrote in a recent blog. "They are happy, however, to fund this campaign by depriving other taxpayers of their own precious resources."
George Zimmerman, vice president of Travel Michigan, said that there is no large multi-million dollar tourism attraction in Michigan like Disney World. He said it would take $28 million to $30 million to fully fund Pure Michigan.
"Most of the tourism in the state is small businesses," Zimmerman said. "I don't believe they have the funds to do that."
Steve Yencich, president of the Tourism Industry Coalition of Michigan, didn't return an e-mail or phone message seeking comment.
LaFaive doesn't buy the argument that Michigan tourism doesn't have the clout to pay for the advertising campaign.
"And yet they appear powerful enough to make the state do it for them," LaFaive wrote in an e-mail. "This program is incredibly unfair to those small businesses without the resources to bend the ears of Lansing politicians."
~~~~~
See also:
An Impromptu Fishing Trip Isn't 'Pure Michigan'
Taxing Canoes and Kayaks
Tourism Study Raises Questions
Spending Tobacco Revenue Like There's No Tomorrow
It's From the Children: "Borrow-and-spend" not just a Washington problem
Tourism Subsidy Beneficiaries Chant on Capitol Steps: "Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!"
COPS, CARS, BOATS AND BANKRUPTCY
Michigan Rolling in Dough? Gives Out Raises, Plus Millions in Tourism Subsidies
Tight security locked out dozens of anti-right-to-work protesters from the State Capitol as Governor Snyder was delivering his "State of the State" address. Protesters tried to disrupt the speech by banging and chanting outside the building.
Most Popular
FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS — OFTEN FAMILY MEMBERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
opinion May 25, 2012
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting.
The first counter tallies SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the Governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
For more information, visit:
Comments