(Editor's note: This was originally posted by Andrew Coulson, a Mackinac Center adjunct scholar, on The Cato Institute Web site.)

Michigan is facing a projected $2.8 billion state budget shortfall. As a result, Gov. Jennifer Granholm has cut $212 million from public school spending — rousing the ire of parents and education officials around the state. But if Michigan merely converted all its conventional public schools to charter public schools, without altering current funding formulas, it would save $3.5 billion.

Here's how: the average Michigan charter school spends $2,200 less per pupil than the average district school — counting only the state and local dollars. Put another way, Michigan school districts spend 25 percent more state and local dollars per pupil, on average, than charter schools. Sum up the savings to Michigan taxpayers from a mass district-to-charter exodus and it comes to $3.5 billion.

Stay Engaged

Receive our weekly emails!

Anyone who wants to check that calculation can download the Microsoft Excel 2007 spreadsheet file I used to compute it. It contains both the raw data from the relevant NCES Common Core of Data files, and all the calculations. Among other things, it shows total per pupil spending and the pupil-teacher ratio for every charter public school and every conventional public school district in the state.


Related Articles:

Legacy Society Luncheon: The Morality of Capitalism

Metro Detroit Transit Tax Assumes Funding From State and Feds That May Never Come

Legacy Society

You'd Be In Big Trouble If You Spent Like Uncle Sam

An Opportunity to Improve School Funding Equity?

State Health Policy Toolkit